Editorials & Articles – 2 March 2024 - SAMUNDRAGYAAN EDUCATION FOUNDATION

Topic: GS2 – Indian Polity – Judiciary Crucial for UPSC as it explores the surge in India’s death row, Supreme Court’s reform attempts, and systemic issues in sentencing.

Context

● The article discusses the surge in India’s death row population, the Supreme Court’s efforts to reform death penalty sentencing, and the increasing number of acquittals, revealing systemic failures.

Rising Death Row Population:

India’s death row population reached a record high of 561 by the end of 2023.
Supreme Court acquitted nearly 55% of death row prisoners in 2023, raising questions about the efficacy of death penalty sentencing.

Supreme Court’s Sentencing Reform Attempts:

In 2022, a Constitution Bench was convened to reform death penalty sentencing, indicating an initiative for change.
However, data reveals that trial courts continued to impose death sentences without following the directives from the Supreme Court.

High Court Reluctance and Acquittals:

High Courts showed reluctance in confirming death sentences, with only one confirmation in 2023.
Supreme Court’s acquittals of death row prisoners highlight systemic failures in police, prosecution, and trial courts.

Systemic Failures in Death Penalty Cases:

Acquittals were outcomes of fabricated evidence, manipulated reports, tampered forensic evidence, and dubious recoveries by the police.
Systemic problems within the administration of the death penalty were not acknowledged in the Court’s decisions.

Urgency for Systemic Recognition:

Growing number of acquittals emphasizes the urgent need to recognize systemic problems in the criminal justice system.
While the Court has addressed systemic concerns in sentencing, acquittals underscore broader issues in the death penalty administration.

State of Death Row Prisoners:

Death row prisoners live in constant fear, subjected to violence, ridicule, and humiliation within prisons.
Psychological ramifications persist even after acquittal or commutation, revealing the severe impact of the death row experience.

Increasing Death Row Population:

Despite acquittals, the death row population continues to rise due to trial courts’ unjustifiable use of the death penalty.
Project 39A’s report highlights a 15% decrease in High Court case disposal rate, exacerbating the crisis.

Supreme Court’s Response:

The Supreme Court’s convening of a Constitution Bench is commendable but may be ineffective in addressing the death penalty crisis.
Reform efforts focused on sentencing fail to percolate to trial courts, indicating the limited impact of such initiatives.

Dissonance in Supreme Court’s Approach:

Project 39A’s report suggests a dissonance between the narrow sentencing question prioritized by the Court and the broader crisis across the criminal process.
The Court’s reform efforts may be insufficient and untimely in addressing the systemic issues in death penalty cases.

Case For And Against – Death Penalty

Case FOR the Death Penalty

Retribution: An eye-for-an-eye sense of justice. Some crimes are so heinous that the perpetrators deserve the ultimate punishment.
Deterrence: The fear of execution might prevent others from committing similar crimes.
Protection of Society: Prevents extremely dangerous criminals from ever committing crimes again.
Closure for Victims’ Families: May offer a sense of closure or justice for the families of victims.

Case AGAINST the Death Penalty

Irreversible Mistakes: The justice system is imperfect, and innocent people may be wrongly executed.
Cruel and Unusual: It is considered by many to be inhumane, regardless of the crime.
No Proven Deterrent Effect: Studies haven’t conclusively shown that the death penalty reduces crime rates.
Racial and Economic Bias: The death penalty is disproportionately applied to those of colour and the poor.
Alternative Punishments: Life imprisonment without parole offers similar protection to society.

Blue water power

Topic: GS2 – International Relations – Bilateral Relations

This topic is relevant for both Prelims and Mains in the context of Understanding India’s engagement with Mauritius and the broader Indian Ocean region, including initiatives like the Agalega project.

Context:

Agalega, a small atoll in the Western Indian Ocean, comprising North and South Agalega islands, has recently gained attention due to a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed in 2015 between India and Mauritius for its development.
Despite its modest size of 25 square kilometers, Agalega’s strategic location and historical significance have sparked debates and speculation about its geopolitical importance.
This analysis delves into the various dimensions of Agalega’s significance, including its historical background, development initiatives, and geopolitical implications.

Historical Background: From Slave Plantation to Strategic Outpost:

Originally a slave plantation colony, Agalega’s history is marked by its exploitation and isolation.
The only town, Vingt-Cinq, bears testament to its grim past, named after the lashes slaves would receive as punishment.
Over time, Agalega evolved into a remote outpost occasionally visited by Coast Guard planes and helicopters.
However, it remained largely neglected, lacking basic infrastructure such as medical and educational facilities.

Development Initiatives: From Neglect to Transformation:

The 2015 MoU signaled a shift in Agalega’s trajectory, aiming to transform its infrastructure and connectivity.
Initially serving as a lifeline for its few hundred inhabitants, Agalega received sporadic shipments of essential commodities via the MV Trochetia due to the absence of port facilities.
However, the MoU envisaged the development of Agalega’s airstrip into a full-length airfield capable of accommodating larger aircraft, along with the establishment of a harbor to anchor big ships.
Additionally, civilian projects including medical facilities and schools were inaugurated, marking a significant departure from Agalega’s neglected past.

Geopolitical Implications: India’s Strategic Maneuver:

While the development initiatives for Agalega were portrayed as efforts to improve the lives of its inhabitants, skeptics raised concerns about ulterior motives, particularly regarding India’s purported interest in establishing a military presence.
Critics speculated that India aimed to counter China’s growing influence in the region, positioning Agalega as a strategic outpost in the Indian Ocean.
Despite Prime Minister Jugnauth’s assurances of mutual cooperation and benefits for both India and Mauritius, suspicions persisted regarding India’s broader geostrategic objectives.

Maritime Significance and Regional Dynamics:

The upgraded infrastructure in Agalega aligns with India’s broader maritime strategy, emphasizing the importance of securing vital sea lanes and enhancing maritime surveillance capabilities.
With Agalega’s inclusion in India’s strategic network, the Indian Ocean region witnesses a reconfiguration of power dynamics, with India positioning itself as a key player alongside traditional powers like the US, UK, and France.
Moreover, India’s partnership with Mauritius underscores its commitment to maintaining stability and security in the region, countering Chinese assertiveness and safeguarding its own interests.

Conclusion:

Agalega’s journey from obscurity to geopolitical significance reflects the evolving dynamics of the Indian Ocean region.
While development initiatives offer hope for its inhabitants, Agalega’s strategic value cannot be overlooked.
As India asserts its influence in the region and navigates complex geopolitical rivalries, Agalega emerges as a focal point in the broader contest for maritime supremacy.
Its transformation underscores the intricate interplay between historical legacies, development imperatives, and geopolitical ambitions shaping the Indian Ocean’s future trajectory.

Mission Sagar

Mission Sagar, initiated by the Indian government in May 2020 as part of its commitment to providing essential assistance to Indian Ocean countries during the COVID-19 pandemic, marked a significant humanitarian outreach effort.
This endeavor was subsequently followed by Mission Sagar II in November and Mission Sagar III in December of the same year.
According to the Ministry of External Affairs, Mission Sagar aligns with the broader vision of SAGAR (SECURITY and Growth for All in the Region), although it’s essential to note that Mission Sagar and the SAGAR initiative are distinct entities.
While Mission Sagar focuses on humanitarian and inter-country outreach, the SAGAR initiative is a policy doctrine centered on maritime cooperation.

Vision ‘SAGAR’

Launched in 2015, Security and Growth for All in the Region (SAGAR) is India’s strategic vision for the Indian Ocean Region (IOR).
Through SAGAR, India aims to deepen economic and security cooperation with maritime neighbors, assist in building maritime security capabilities, and ensure the region becomes inclusive, collaborative, and adheres to international law.
SAGAR is integral to India’s broader maritime policies, including the Act East Policy, Project Sagarmala, Project Mausam, India as a ‘net security provider,’ and the focus on the Blue Economy.

The Global Orders

Topic: GS2 – International Relations – Important International institutions, agencies and fora – their structure, mandate.
This topic is relevant for both Prelims and Mains as this analysis underscores the significance of international forums like the Raisina Dialogue and their role in shaping global discourse and fostering cooperation.

Context:

The Munich Security Conference (MSC) and the Raisina Dialogue are two significant international forums that recently concluded their annual sessions.
These conferences serve as platforms for global leaders, policymakers, and thinkers to discuss pressing security and geopolitical issues.
Despite their different focuses and participant compositions, both conferences shed light on the evolving dynamics of the global community, which is increasingly fragmented into distinct blocs with divergent realities, priorities, and fewer commonalities compared to a decade ago.

The Munich Security Conference: A European Perspective:

The MSC has long been a cornerstone of European security discourse, often reflecting European anxieties and priorities.
Dominated by discussions surrounding the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, this year’s MSC underscored Ukraine’s centrality in shaping the worldviews of European and American policymakers.
Ukraine served as a de facto benchmark for evaluating bilateral relations between the West and the rest of the world, at least until recent conflicts such as the war in Gaza.
From a realpolitik standpoint, prioritizing and upholding Ukraine’s sovereignty is seen as crucial for Europe, given concerns about Russia’s potential imperial ambitions in Eastern Europe.

The Raisina Dialogue: Diverse Perspectives and Growing Influence:

In contrast, the Raisina Dialogue fosters a distinct discourse by attracting a wider range of participants, including Russian policymakers and thinkers from countries not typically present at Munich, notably Iran.
The Raisina Dialogue and the MSC sharply diverge on issues such as the invasion of Ukraine and the current state of the international order.
This divergence raises questions about the widening intellectual gap between the West and the East and the ability of capitals like Delhi, Riyadh, Doha, and Abu Dhabi to introduce policy agendas that compete with established forums like the MSC and the World Economic Forum.

India’s Growing Influence and Multi-alignment Strategy:

The rise of the Raisina Dialogue coincides with India’s growing influence and its evolving strategic approach, shifting from non-alignment to multi-alignment.
Buoyed by India’s successful G20 presidency, the Raisina Dialogue is expanding its reach and engaging a broader range of policymakers and thinkers.
India’s External Affairs Minister, S Jaishankar, emphasized the importance of increased engagement with Moscow, highlighting Russia’s inclination towards Asia and the need for diverse options to prevent a self-fulfilling prophecy of isolation.

Challenges and Opportunities in the Fragmenting Global Community:

Both conferences reflect the widening intellectual gap between the West and the Rest, presenting a challenge to fostering global cooperation on security and development issues.
This fragmentation is not a simplistic binary of Munich versus Raisina but rather a story of a fragmented global community with diverging worldviews.
The rise of platforms like the Raisina Dialogue alongside other forums signifies the evolving global landscape, particularly the growing influence of Eastern powers, which were unimaginable decades ago.

Conclusion:

The Munich Security Conference and the Raisina Dialogue offer insights into the evolving dynamics of the global community.
While the MSC remains a cornerstone of European security discourse, the Raisina Dialogue represents diverse perspectives and the growing influence of emerging powers like India.
The widening intellectual gap between the West and the Rest presents both challenges and opportunities for fostering global cooperation.
In this fragmented global community, platforms like the Raisina Dialogue play a crucial role in empowering diverse voices and reflecting the evolving global landscape.

Raisina Dialogue: 2024 Theme and Thematic Pillars

Chaturanga: Conflict, Contest, Cooperate, Create.
The participants engaged with each other over six “thematic pillars”. These include:
Tech Frontiers: Regulations & Realities
Peace with the Planet: Invest & Innovate
War & Peace: Armouries & Asymmetries
Decolonising Multilateralism: Institutions & Inclusion
The Post 2030 Agenda: People & Progress
Defending Democracy: Society & Sovereignty.

Asian Resurfacing v. Central Bureau of Investigation: The Big Problem of Undue Delays in Trials in India

Why in News?

A five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court overruled its 2018 decision in Asian Resurfacing v. Central Bureau of Investigation.
The SC observed that a stay order can only come to an end after all the parties in the case have been heard first.

What’s in Today’s Article?

The Big Problem of Undue Delays in Trials in India
What is the Asian Resurfacing Case Ruling?
What was the Impact of the Asian Resurfacing Case Ruling?
Arguments of the Petitioner and the Government
On What Grounds has the Asian Resurfacing Case Ruling been Undone?

The Big Problem of Undue Delays in Trials in India:

In India’s three-tier system of courts, a trial court’s decision can be challenged at every stage, not just at the final stage after a verdict is delivered.
Stay orders are passed for a court to temporarily halt a judicial proceeding, to secure the rights of a citizen.
Grant of stay invariably delays the trial (for decades sometimes), irrespective of which side benefits from it. For example,
- If an HC in a case had to consider the challenge against an order framing charges (by the trial court), it would first grant a stay of trial and then grant a date for hearing arguments on framing charges.
- With Courts bogged down with criminal cases that perhaps need more immediate attention, such as bail cases, the hearing against framing of charges gets delayed.

What is the Asian Resurfacing Case Ruling?

In 2018, a three-judge bench of SC was deciding a batch of cases involving the Prevention of Corruption Act.
- These batches of cases had one aspect in common – that the respective High Courts had granted a stay at some stage of trial.
In its ruling, the SC (while using its powers under Article 142) held that –
- While a HC has jurisdiction in appropriate cases to consider the challenge against an order framing charge and also to grant stay,
- But how such power is to be exercised and when stay ought to be granted needs to be considered further.
To address the big problem (of undue delays in trials) plaguing the criminal justice system, the SC held that interim orders of stay at the HC and Civil Court level will be only valid for six months.
- At the end of this period, they will automatically be rescinded or “vacated”.

What was the Impact of the Asian Resurfacing Case Ruling?

Additional stay trials arose unexpectedly following the 2018 verdict. Lawyers would cite the Asian Resurfacing ruling to alter the status quo. For example,
- Say a frivolous FIR is filed and a trial court has issued summons.
- This would be challenged before the HC, but the HC would first stay the summons and grant a date for the hearing.
- But citing the Asian Resurfacing case meant that a trial court would issue non-bailable warrants suddenly for not appearing before the Court.
- All of this occurred while the HC had not yet heard arguments for quashing the summons itself.
While this added the load on the HCs and burdened the average litigant, the verdict also raises key questions of law.
- Is it possible for the SC (under Article 142) to order the automatic revocation of all interim orders of the HC delaying proceedings in civil and criminal matters when a specified term expires?
- Whether the SC (under Article 142) can direct the HCs to decide pending cases in which interim orders of stay of proceedings have been granted on a day-to-day basis and within a fixed period?

Arguments of the Petitioner and the Government:

The vacation of a stay is a judicial decision which needs application of mind, without which judicial decisions would become arbitrary.
- Automatic vacation of stay would be antithetical to this principle.
The Asian Resurfacing judgement infringes on the discretion afforded to HCs to decide applications for vacation of stay orders under Article 226(3) of the Constitution.
Deciding timelines for judicial proceedings is a decision for Parliament to make through its law-making power, not the courts.

On What Grounds has the Asian Resurfacing Case Ruling been Undone?

The five-judge bench held that “Sometimes, in the quest of justice we end up doing injustice. Asian Resurfacing is a clear example of the same.”
The constitutional courts should refrain from laying down precise timelines for deciding cases.
- This highlights the discretion that should be given to lower courts which are more aware of “grassroots issues”.
The SC also pointed out that courts often have different patterns when it comes to their pending caseload, and so the concerned court is best placed to decide which cases to prioritise.
Automatically vacating a stay order after six months would in fact “defeat justice” by nullifying interim orders that had been lawfully passed without hearing the parties.
The six-month time limit would amount to court-created legislation, which is impermissible.
- Only the legislature has the power to decide if a category of cases should be decided within a specific amount of time.
Article 226(3) of the Constitution already provides a two-week time limit for HCs to consider an application for the vacation of an interim order.
- If the application is not disposed of within those two weeks, Article 226(3) provides that the interim order will be vacated.

Govt amends rules related to postal ballots

Why in news?

In the next Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections, elderly citizens aged 85 and above can choose postal ballots.
The government has changed the rule, increasing the eligibility from the previous limit of 80 years.

What’s in today’s article?

Postal Voting
News Summary

Postal Voting

About
- Postal voting, also known as absentee voting, is a method of voting in which electors cast their ballots by mail rather than in person at a polling station.
- This method is particularly useful for individuals who are unable to vote in person due to various reasons.
  - E.g., being away from their home constituency, having a disability, or being engaged in essential services on election day.
Eligibility
- Service voters:
  - Members of the armed forces, paramilitary forces, and other government employees deployed on election duty far from their home constituencies.
- Absentee voters:
  - Individuals who are unable to vote in person due to reasons such as being away from their home constituency for work, illness, or disability.
- Electors on election duty:
  - Government officials and polling staff who are assigned duties at polling stations other than their own.
- Electors under preventive detention:
  - Individuals who are detained under preventive custody orders during the election period.
Eligibility during Covid pandemic
- During the Covid-19 pandemic, the facility was extended to those infected or suspected to be infected with the coronavirus, starting with the Bihar Assembly elections in 2020.
- Before the Bihar elections, the EC had recommended extending the postal ballot facility to those above 65 years of age and the Law Ministry had notified the amendment in June 2020.
  - However, the ECI eventually decided not to extend the facility to those above 65 years.
  - This was because the number of polling parties that would be required to cover the expanded age group would have been impractical.
- Finally, in August 2023, the Law Ministry again amended the rule to take the eligibility back to 80 years from 65 years.
Significance
- Postal ballots play a crucial role in ensuring that eligible voters exercise their franchise, even when they are unable to vote in person.
- They expand the accessibility of the electoral process and contribute to a more inclusive and representative democracy.
Issues associated with postal ballot
- Vote buying
  - There is a chance that someone else is casting the vote on behalf of the voter because the voter chooses to sell his or her vote.
- Freedom of voting & secrecy might be affected
  - As the voter will have vote on a printed ballot from their respective home, someone might observe the voter casting her/his vote.
  - This might lead to coercion or forcing the voter to make a particular choice.
- Reliability and delay of postal services
  - While the reliability and delay of postal services in one’s own country are well known to the election commission, conditions might be worse in other countries.
  - Consequently, the postal voting process must start early enough to take into accountany unforeseeable conditions.

News summary: Govt amends rules related to postal ballots

The government, in consultation with the Election Commission, amended the Conduct of Election Rules (1961) to raise the minimum age for senior citizens, eligible for voting by postal ballot, to 85 years from 80 years.
As per Rule 27A of the Conduct of Election Rules, postal ballot facility was extended to:
- senior citizens above 80 years,
- persons with disability,
- poll officers, and
- Covid-positive persons starting with the 2020 Bihar assembly poll, which coincided with the pandemic period.
However, a review by the Election Commission showed that no more than 2-3% of 80-plus voters had opted to vote through postal ballots; the rest insisted on turning up at the polling station to cast their vote.
- The total number of senior citizens above 80 years is 1.75 crore, with those aged 80-85 years being 98 lakh.
Hence, the govt decided to amend the rule.

India to set up International Big Cat Alliance

Why in news?

The Union Cabinet approved the establishment of International Big Cat Alliance (IBCA) with headquarters in India with a one-time budgetary support of Rs.150 crore for a period of five years from 2023-24 to 2027-28.
Framework of Agreement of IBCA has been drafted largely on the pattern of International Solar Alliance (ISA).

What’s in today’s article?

International Big Cat Alliance (IBCA)
Is India Home to All Seven Big Cats?

International Big Cat Alliance (IBCA)

Background:
- During the Global Tiger Day event in 2019, PM Modi urged global leaders to unite against poaching in Asia.
- He repeated this call during the 50th anniversary celebration of India’s Project Tiger on April 9, 2023, announcing the launch of an International Big Cat Alliance.
About
- The International Big Cat Alliance (IBCA) is a global alliance that aims to conserve the world’s seven main big cats.
- It will provide a platform for the member nations to share knowledge and expertise and extend support to recovery efforts in potential habitats.
Aim: To work towards the protection and conservation of the seven major big cats — tiger, lion, leopard, snow leopard, puma, jaguar and cheetah.
HQ: India
Membership
- Membership to the alliance will be open to 96 range countries.
  - These are the countries which contain the natural habitat of these big cats.
- The alliance is also open to other countries, conservation organisations, scientific organisations, businesses, and corporates interested in supporting big cats.
- So far, 16 countries have given their written consent to be part of the IBCA.
- In addition, nine international organizations, including the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) International, have given consent to join the alliance.
Governance Structure
- A General Assembly consisting of all member countries.
- A Council of at least seven but not more than 15 member countries elected by the General Assembly for a term of 5 years, and a Secretariat.
- Upon the recommendation of the Council, the General Assembly will appoint the IBCA Secretary General for a specific term.
- A Secretariat
Funding
- The first five years (2023-24 to 2027-28) will be supported by India’s ‘total grant assistance’ ofRs.150 crore.
- After that, the IBCA is expected to sustain itself through membership fees and contributions from bilateral and multilateral institutions and the private sector.
Activities
- It will provide a platform for the member nations to share knowledge and expertise and extend support to recovery efforts in potential habitats.
- Its major activities will include advocacy, partnership, knowledge e-portal, capacity building, eco-tourism, partnerships between expert groups, and finance tapping.
- IBCA will also assist existing species-specific inter-governmental platforms to boost conservation efforts.
Benefits
- The advantages of membership are a central common repository for technical know-how and a corpus of funds.
- The alliance will strengthen existing species-specific intergovernmental platforms, networks, and transnational initiatives on conservation and protection.
- Frontline staff in member-countries will be trained in eliciting local support for big-cat conservation, and research and development in wildlife monitoring.
- Local communities living in the vicinity of the forests will also be encouraged and trained in developing eco-tourism and livelihood opportunities.
- It recognizes the importance of integrating biodiversity policies with sustainable development goals (SDGs) to achieve holistic and inclusive conservation outcomes.

Is India Home to All Seven Big Cats?

Out of 7 big cats, India is home to 5: Tiger, Lion, Leopard, Snow Leopard and Cheetah
Royal Bengal Tiger
- As per the latest Tiger Census conducted in 2018-19, tiger population in India has increased to 2967.
- India now accounts for about 70% of the world’s tiger population.
Asiatic Lion
- Gir National Park in Gujarat is the last abode for the surviving population of the Asiatic Lions in the world.
- Since the late 1960s, population of Asiatic Lions has increased from less than 200 to 674 (Census 2020).
Leopard
- It is estimated that 12,000-14,000 leopards occur in India, and the population is the most genetically diverse/outbred out of all the subspecies in Asia.
Snow Leopard
- Snow leopard is native to the mountain ranges of Central and South Asia.
- In India, their geographical range encompasses a large part of the western Himalayas including the territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh in the eastern Himalayas.
- In 2021, there are about 7,500 snow leopards left in the world, out of which 500 are in India.
Cheetah
- Cheetah had become extinct in India since 1952.
- In September 2022, Cheetahs have been reintroduced in the wild in India as 8 Cheetahs were imported from Namibia.
- They were released into the Kuno National Park in Madhya Pradesh in November, 2022.

Agalega Islands & Its Significance for India

Why in the News?

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Mauritius Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth virtually inaugurated an air strip and a jetty to ensure maritime security and connectivity to Mauritius’ Agalega islands.

What’s in Today’s Article?

About Agalega Islands (Location, Significance for India, etc.)
News Summary

About Agalega Islands:

Agalega islands lies approximately 650 nautical miles (1,050 km) north of Mauritius.
It is a group of two islands with a total area of 26 sq km and a native population of about 300 people.

Significance of Agalega Islands:

The development of the Agalega Islands is in the socio-economic and national security interest of Mauritius, and also aligns with India’s maritime vision.
The islands, a dependency of Mauritius, were not developed for many years.
The sustainability and well-being of the islands’ inhabitants presented a challenge, as even the most basic needs required referral to Mauritius.
The near absence of an official government or security presence was a serious vulnerability.
This vulnerability could be converted to strength by developing the islands and creating facilities that could operate ships and aircraft.
Building a jetty and an airstrip was therefore considered imperative by the government of Mauritius.
They chose India as their preferred development partner.

Why Did Mauritians Choose India?

Ties between India and Mauritius go back to 1948, 20 years before the country’s independence from Britain.
Seventy per cent of the inhabitants of Mauritius are of Indian origin, and the two countries share deep historical, social, and cultural bonds.
The consistent feature in the history of bilateral relations has been friendship and trust at all levels — the political leadership, the diplomatic and military communities, as well as between the peoples of the two countries.
The development of these strategically located islands required trust more than anything else. Hence, India was the obvious choice.

Significance for India:

The goodwill and trust between the two countries will be further enhanced.
India will welcome opportunities to further develop these islands in collaboration with Mauritius as the latter deems appropriate.
The joint development of Agalega underscores India’s commitment to the vision of Security and Growth for All in the Region (SAGAR).
It will indicate to other maritime neighbours that India is a benign and friendly country that respects the sovereignty of independent nations.
India would like to emerge as the preferred development and security partner in the Indian Ocean Region.

News Summary:

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Mauritius Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth virtually inaugurated an air strip and a jetty in Mauritius’ Agalega islands.
PM Modi said the two countries are working actively towards ensuring security, prosperity and stability in the Indian Ocean region.
These projects will “enhance the island’s capacity and capabilities in marine surveillance and security, while also meeting development objectives”.
Since 2003, several attempts had been made to upgrade the air strip, but nothing concrete materialised.
The move to develop and build the new airstrip and the jetty came after PM Modi’s visit to the island country in March 2015.
PM Modi flagged concerns over challenges in the Indian Ocean region and said India and Mauritius are “natural partners” in the maritime domain to deal with them.

Editorials & Articles – 2 March 2024

ByULF TEAM

By ULF TEAM

Related Post

Editorials & Articles : 5 June 2024

Editorials & Articles : 3 June 2024

Editorials & Articles : 1 June 2024

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You missed

Biosphere Reserves in India

Governors of State : Updated List (June 2024)

Cabinet Ministers of India 2024 : Modi 3.0

Awards and Honours 2024