Sorting by

×
  • Thu. Nov 21st, 2024

Editorials & Articles : 9 May 2024

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
image_pdfimage_print

Editorials & Articles : 9 May 2024

A chance to settle a constitutional clash

Topic: GS2 – Indian Polity
Context
● The Property Owners Association vs State of Maharashtra case before the Supreme Court of India delves into the interpretation of Article 39(b) and the immunity of laws from challenges based on fundamental rights.

● Stemming from historical tensions between fundamental rights and Directive Principles of State Policy, the case offers an opportunity for the Court to clarify the balance between these constitutional principles and reinforce the Constitution’s integrity.

 Introduction: The Interplay between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP)

  • In the recent hearings of Property Owners Association vs State of Maharashtra before a nine-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India, two critical questions emerged, shedding light on the complex relationship between fundamental rights and DPSPs as enshrined in the Constitution.
  • Firstly, the interpretation of the term “material resources of the community” in Article 39(b) was scrutinized.
  • Secondly, the immunity of laws aimed at fulfilling Article 39(b) from challenges based on fundamental rights to equality and freedom was debated.

Historical Context: The Evolution of Constitutional Interpretation

  • The conflict between Part III (fundamental rights) and Part IV (DPSPs) of the Indian Constitution has persisted since its inception.
  • Despite Part III’s enforceability and Part IV’s status as aspirational goals, tensions have arisen, especially during the 1970s when amendments sought to shield legislation from judicial review.

The Introduction of Article 31C:

  • The 25th amendment introduced Article 31C in 1971, aiming to shield laws furthering Article 39(b) and (c) from challenges based on Articles 14 and 19.
  • However, this led to concerns regarding the erosion of judicial review and the potential abuse of legislative powers.
 The 25th Amendment:
● The 25th Amendment to the Indian Constitution was enacted in 1971.

● It introduced Article 31C, which aimed to protect laws designed to achieve the goals outlined in Article 39(b) and (c) from legal challenges.

● Article 39(b) focuses on ensuring ownership and control of resources are distributed to serve the common good.

● Article 39(c) aims to prevent concentration of wealth and means of production.

● Article 31C shields such laws from being struck down on grounds of violating the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 (equality before law) and 19 (freedom of speech and expression).

Kesavananda Bharati Case: Clarifying the Boundaries

  • In the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case of 1973, the Supreme Court held that while certain amendments were permissible, those undermining the Constitution’s basic structure would be deemed void.
  • However, the verdict did not provide a definitive resolution regarding Article 31C’s compatibility with the Constitution’s core principles.

Further Amendments and Judicial Scrutiny

  • The 42nd amendment in 1976 expanded Article 31C’s scope to encompass laws furthering any DPSP, not just Articles 39(b) and (c).
  • Subsequent judicial interventions, such as the Minerva Mills case in 1980, questioned the constitutionality of this amendment, emphasizing the intrinsic connection between fundamental rights and the governance framework.
 The 42nd amendment:
 The 42nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution, enacted in 1976, expanded the scope of Article 31C.

● Initially, Article 31C protected laws furthering the goals of Article 39(b) and (c) from legal challenges.

● However, after the 42nd Amendment, Article 31C extended its protection to laws aimed at fulfilling any Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP).

● DPSPs encompass a wide range of social, economic, and political objectives aimed at promoting the welfare of citizens.

● This expansion allowed a broader range of legislation aimed at advancing societal welfare to be shielded from constitutional challenges based on Articles 14 and 19.

The Conundrum of Article 31C: Uncertainty Persists

  • Despite judicial interventions, clarity regarding Article 31C’s validity remains elusive.
  • Contradictory judgments, exemplified by Waman Rao vs Union of India, underscore the lack of consensus on whether laws aimed at promoting DPSPs can infringe fundamental rights.

Property Owners Case: A Crucial Opportunity for Clarity

  • In the ongoing Property Owners case, the Supreme Court faces the task of determining the validity of a law allowing a State government board to assume control over dilapidated buildings.
  • While examining its alignment with Article 39(b), the Court must grapple with whether such legislation can be subject to scrutiny under Articles 14 and 19.

Conclusion: Resolving the Conflict for Constitutional Integrity

  • The Property Owners case presents an opportune moment for the Supreme Court to reconcile the conflict between fundamental rights and DPSPs.
  • By providing clarity on Article 31C’s compatibility with the Constitution’s basic structure, the Court can reaffirm the primacy of fundamental rights while recognizing the importance of DPSPs in shaping India’s socio-economic landscape.

Giving primacy to human development

Topic: GS2 – Social  Justice, GS3 – Indian Economy – Inclusive Growth
Context
●  This article encapsulates key findings from the Human Development Report 2023-24 and the World Inequality Lab study, highlighting India’s progress and challenges in human development and income inequality.

●  It emphasises the need for a shift towards prioritising inclusive growth and addresses the implications of rising inequality and household debt levels.

 Introduction: India’s Development Challenges

  • The promise of development has become a central theme in political discourse, underscored by recent reports highlighting India’s progress and challenges.
  • The Human Development Report 2023-24 and a study by the World Inequality Lab offer insights into India’s human development and income inequality trends.

Human Development Index (HDI) Ranking and Gender Inequality:

  • India’s HDI ranking improved marginally, placing it at 134 out of 193 countries in 2022, but still lagging behind neighbouring nations like Bhutan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka.
  • Despite progress, India faces significant gender disparities, with a wide gap in labour force participation rates between men and women.

Rising Inequality and Implications:

  • The Human Development Report raises concerns about escalating global inequality, compounded by economic concentration and unequal distribution of wealth.
  • In India, adjusted for inequality, the loss in HDI is substantial, indicating the severity of income disparities.

Income Inequality Trends:

  • The World Inequality Lab study reveals stark income inequality in India, with the top 1% earning significantly more than the rest of the population.
  • Growth in incomes for the top decile (Wealthiest 10%) has outpaced the rest, potentially leading to the shrinking of the middle class.

Impact on Household Debt and Savings:

  • Household debt levels have surged, reaching a record high of 40% of GDP by December 2023, while net financial savings have plummeted.
  • High debt levels and low savings pose challenges for economic growth and human development.

Call for an Alternate Growth Strategy:

  • Given India’s development challenges, there’s a need for a paradigm shift towards prioritising human development over short-term gains.
  • Political will and a redefined narrative of development are necessary to address income inequality and promote inclusive growth.

Conclusion:

  • India’s development journey is marked by progress but also marred by persistent challenges such as income inequality and low human development indices.
  • Addressing these challenges requires concerted efforts, policy reforms, and a commitment to inclusive growth for all sections of society.
Inequality in India:
Inequality Trends in India:

  • Wealth Inequality: Top 10% own 77% of national wealth; poorest half have only 4.1%.
  • Income Inequality: Top 10% and 1% hold 57% and 22% of total income respectively; bottom 50% share reduced to 13%.
  • Tax Burden: 64% of GST from bottom 50%; only 4% from top 10%.
  •  Global Hunger Index: India’s score at 28.7, considered serious; highest child-wasting rate.
  • Healthcare Accessibility: 63 million pushed into poverty annually due to healthcare costs; majority unable to access needed care.

Causes of Increasing Inequality in India:

  •  Unequal Access to Education: Disparities in educational opportunities perpetuate socio-economic inequalities, limiting upward mobility for marginalised communities.
  • Informal Sector Dominance: The dominance of the informal sector in India’s economy leads to low wages, insecure employment, and lack of social protection, exacerbating income disparities.
  • Unequal Distribution of Wealth: Concentration of wealth among a small elite contributes to widening income gaps and socio-economic inequalities.
  • Caste and Gender Discrimination: Persistent caste-based and gender-based discrimination marginalise certain groups, limiting their access to opportunities and resources.
  • Urban-Rural Divide: Disparities between urban and rural areas in terms of infrastructure, employment opportunities, and access to basic services widen income and wealth gaps.

Way Forward:

  • Investment in Education: Enhance access to quality education and skill development programs to promote equal opportunities for all.
  • Job Creation: Implement policies to stimulate job creation, particularly in sectors with high labour-absorptive capacity, to reduce unemployment and underemployment.
  • Social Protection: Strengthen social safety nets and welfare programs to provide financial support and assistance to vulnerable populations.
  • Progressive Taxation: Introduce progressive tax policies to redistribute wealth and reduce income inequalities.
  • Gender and Caste Equality: Promote gender equality and social inclusion through affirmative action policies and measures to address caste-based discrimination.
  • Rural Development: Focus on rural development initiatives to bridge the urban-rural divide and promote inclusive growth.

Roti, kapda, makaan, good air

Topic: GS2 – Governance – Government policies – Interventions for development in various sectors

GS3 – Environment – Environment Pollution and Degradation

Context:
  • The inclusion of environmental, climate change, and air pollution issues in the 2024 Lok Sabha manifestos of major political parties is a positive development.
  • However, the question arises whether these issues are among the top priorities or mere guarantees for parties and candidates.
  • Additionally, the analysis explores the potential for actual improvement in air quality, emphasizing the need for it to become a people’s movement or a prominent political issue.

Lack of Priority in Political Agendas:

  • Background: Manifestos typically reflect the issues that resonate with voters, shaping political priorities.
  • Analysis:
    • Despite its significance, air quality has not emerged as a top priority for either voters or political parties.
    • Limited information dissemination by local government bodies has contributed to the public’s lack of concern regarding air pollution, which could have severe consequences in the future.

Perception of Air Quality:

  • Background: Some perceive poor air quality as an inevitable consequence of economic development, prioritizing economic progress over environmental concerns.
  • Analysis:
    • However, studies indicate substantial economic losses due to air pollution, highlighting the need for urgent action.
    • Economic theories like the Kuznets curve suggest that environmental degradation initially increases with economic development but eventually improves.
    • Yet, the challenge lies in determining the threshold of economic development where this improvement occurs.

Turning Air Pollution into a Political Agenda:

  • Background: Air pollution must become a mainstream political issue to drive significant change.
  • Analysis:
    • For this to happen, it needs consistent coverage in mainstream media and public discourse.
    • Generating public awareness is crucial, requiring collaboration between academia, scientific communities, and local government bodies.
    • Initiatives like the National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) are commendable but require better implementation and decentralization.

Strategies for Improvement:

  • Background: To address air pollution effectively, on-ground activities and public awareness are essential.
  • Analysis:
    • Allocating funds for pollution reduction efforts, decentralizing policies, and engaging local communities are critical steps.
    • Micro-level initiatives, such as identifying pollution hotspots and creating green zones, can directly involve individuals in pollution mitigation efforts.
    • Additionally, regular public awareness programs and mass movements are vital for spreading the demand for clean air across the country.

Conclusion:

  • Efforts to improve air quality in India must transcend political promises and become a collective endeavor involving all stakeholders.
  • By prioritizing public awareness, decentralized action, and community engagement, India can progress towards cleaner air and a sustainable future.
What Measures should be taken to Control Air Pollution?
  • ·      Alternative Strategy of City Building: There is a compelling need to have an alternative strategy of city building, where the focus is on more public transport, having secure pedestrian paths and bicycle lanes with the creation of a post of bicycle officers.
  • Promote Public Transport: There needs to be good public transport, with investment in buses for towns and cities. It is estimated that nearly 10 lakh buses would need to be added to the existing bus fleet in cities to meet the demands of urban mobility.
  • There must be firm initiatives that emulate the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission.
  • Control of Private Vehicles: Strong steps need to be taken to control private motorized vehicular movement in the cities. A congestion tax being levied on private car owners driving during peak hours can be thought of. Likewise, an odd number-even number plate formula can be another important intervention.
  • Some cities have a no-car day on certain days — an example that should be put into practice by those in power and with influence.
  • For Example, World Car Free Day is celebrated annually on 22nd September to encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation.
  • Zero Acceptance of Industrial Pollution: There should be zero acceptance of industrial pollution and real-time monitoring must become a reality. There must be street supervision by residents instead of waiting for the statutory bodies to react, which urban local bodies can ensure.
  • Preservation of Urban Commons: Urban commons (ponds, water bodies, urban forests, parks, playgrounds) are another major area that should not at all be allowed to be taken over by either public or private bodies for private gains. Urban communities must protect, nurture and expand them.
  • Incorporating Ecological Wisdom in Urban Planning: Incorporating ecological principles into urban planning, as advocated by Ian McHarg’s “Designing with Nature,” can help create more sustainable and environmentally friendly cities. This involves considering the natural environment, open spaces, and afforestation within the city.
  • Promote Public Awareness and Participation: Raise public awareness about the sources and effects of air pollution and integrate pollution guides and standard operating procedures into the daily lives of city residents.

Plea on maintainability of CBI probes

Why in news?

  • Supreme Court has reserved its verdict on the West Bengal government’s suit alleging that the CBI is pressing ahead with investigation into post-poll violence cases in the state, without securing its prior nod as per the law.
  • Earlier, the Centre had told SC that West Bengal’s original suit under Article 131 of the Constitution against it to not allow probe by the agency in the state was not maintainable and is an abuse of legal process.

What’s in today’s article?

  • Article 131 of the Constitution
  • About CBI
  • Consent” Required by the CBI for Conducting Investigation in a State
  • Plea on maintainability of CBI probes

Article 131 of the Constitution of India

  • It gives the Supreme Court (SC) the power to exclusively decide disputes between different units of the Indian Federation.
  • These disputes include:
    • Between the Government of India and one or more states
    • Between the Government of India and any state(s) on one side and one or more states on the other
    • Between two or more states, if the dispute involves a question of law or fact on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends

Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI):

  • About
    • The CBI is the premier investigating agency of India operating under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions.
    • It traces its origin from the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DPSE) Act, 1946, which regulates the CBI.
    • As the DPSE Act is not passed by Parliament of India, CBI is created by an executive order of the government, hence not a statutory body
    • Originally set up to probe cases of corruption in the government departments, CBI’s jurisdiction expanded to include several economic crimes, special crimes, cases of corruption and other cases.
  • Investigating powers of CBI are divided into:
    • Anti-Corruption Division: It investigates cases against central government employees, public servants working under state governments (entrusted to the CBI by the state).
    • The Economic Offences Division: It investigates financial crimes, bank frauds, money laundering, illegal money market operations, graft in PSUs and banks.
    • The Special Crimes Division: It handles cases of conventional nature such as offences relating to internal security, espionage, narcotics and psychotropic substances, etc.

Consent Required by the CBI for Conducting Investigation in a State:

  • Legal basis: Section 6 of the DPSE Act authorises the central government to direct CBI to probe a case within the jurisdiction of any state but only with the consent of the concerned state government.
    • However, the SC and HCs can order CBI to investigate such a crime anywhere in the country without the consent of the state.
  • Types of consent:
    • General consent: When a state gives a general consent to the CBI for probing a case, the agency is not required to seek fresh permission every time it enters that state in connection with investigation or for every case.
      • It is normally given by states to help the CBI in the seamless investigation of corruption cases against central government employees in their states.
    • Specific consent: When a general consent is withdrawn, CBI needs to seek case-wise (specific) consent for investigation from the concerned state government.
      • If specific consent is not granted, the CBI officials will not have the power of police personnel when they enter that state, preventing the CBI from conducting a thorough inquiry.
  • States which have withdrawn general consent so far
    • So far, 10 States have withdrawn the general consent to CBI to probe the case. These are:
      • Punjab, Jharkhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal, Mizoram, Telangana, Meghalaya, and Tamil Nadu.
  • Withdrawal of General Consent and its Impact:
    • The withdrawal of general consent does not stop CBI probes in all cases.
    • The CBI continues to probe in old cases until specifically taken back by the state government.
    • Further, it continues to investigate cases that were given to it by a court order.
    • The CBI can also challenge the decision (of withdrawal of general consent) in a court showcasing its progress of investigation in the case.
    • When the CBI does not have a general consent, it can approach a local court (as per a provision in the CrPC) for a search warrant and conduct investigation.

Centre’s Plea on maintainability of CBI probes

  • Background
    • The Supreme court was hearing an original suit filed by the State of West Bengal (WB) under Article 131 of the Constitution.
    • The WB Govt has accused the Union govt of interfering in cases originating within the State’s jurisdiction by unilaterally authorising the CBI to probe them.
  • Stand of WB Govt
    • The Centre continues to employ the CBI regardless of the fact that the State had withdrawn its general consent to CBI investigations within its territory.
      • WB had withdrawn the consent under Section 6 of DSPE Act, 1946 way back in November 2018.
    • The CBI has registered over 15 cases in West Bengal.
  • Stand of Centre
    • The Solicitor General had argued that the suit was not maintainable and should be dismissed at the outset. WB had wrongly made the Union the defendant in the suit. The petitioners were wrong to term the CBI as the “police force of the Union”.  The Centre had no role in where and how the CBI conducted its investigation.
    • It also argued that the suit could not be amended to make CBI a defendant as it was not a ‘state’ under Article 131.
  • Observations made by the SC
    • Questioning the claim of the Centre, the SC highlighted Section 5(1) of the DSPE Act, the statute which governs the premier probe agency.
      • Section 5(1) allows the Central government to give the Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI) jurisdiction over areas in states, including railway areas, to investigate specific offenses.

India as third largest producer of solar power in 2023

Why in news?

As per the Global Electricity Review 2024, India surpassed Japan to claim the title of the world’s third-largest solar power generator in 2023 as it has climbed from 9th ranking in 2015.

  • India generated 113 Billion Units (BU) of solar power in 2023 compared to Japan’s 110 BU.

What’s in today’s article?

  • Global Electricity Review 2024
  • Key highlights of the report
  • India specific observations made in the report
  • Opportunities for Solar energy in India

Global Electricity Review 2024

  • It was published by global energy think tank
  • The report offers a comprehensive examination of the global power landscape in 2023, drawing on data from individual countries.
    • It has analysed the data from 80 nations that represent 92% of global electricity demand, along with historical data from 215 countries.
  • It provides a realistic summary of how on track the electricity transition is for limiting global heating to 1.5 degrees.

Key highlights of the report

  • Share of solar energy in global electricity in 2023
    • Solar produced a record 5.5 per cent of global electricity in 2023.
  • Trajectory of solar energy has been accelerating rapidly
    • For the nineteenth consecutive year, solar maintained its status as the fastest-growing electricity source worldwide.
      • It outpaced coal in new electricity additions by more than two fold in 2023.
  • Share of renewable energy in global electricity produced
    • Renewable sources of energy made up 30% of global electricity Renewables have expanded from 19% (in 2000), driven by an increase in solar and wind power, to 30% (in 2023).
    • Combined with nuclear, the world generated almost 40% of its electricity from low-carbon sources in 2023.
  • Fossil fuel generation to drop in 2024
    • The report forecasts fossil fuel generation to drop in 2024 and the trend to continue in other years.
    • It suggests that 2023 might be the year when the fossil fuel production may have peaked globally.
  • China is the main contributor in renewable energy in 2023
    • China accounted for 51% of the additional global solar generation and 60% of new global wind generation in 2023.

India specific observations made in the report

  • India as third-largest solar power generator in 2023
    • India’s growth in solar generation in 2023 pushed the country past Japan to become the world’s third-largest solar power generator.
      • It has climbed from ranking ninth in 2015.
      • China and USA are two major producers ahead of India in 2023.
    • In terms of installed solar power capacity, India ranks fifth in the world while Japan is at third place (83 GW).
  • Share of solar energy in overall electricity produced
    • In 2023, India generated 5.8% of its electricity from solar energy.
  • India experienced the world’s fourth-largest surge in solar generation in 2023
    • It added 18 Terawatt hours (TWh) to its capacity, following China (+156 TWh), the United States (+33 TWh), and Brazil (+22 TWh).
    • These top four countries collectively accounted for 75% of global solar growth that year.
  • Solar energy generation in 2023 as compared to 2015
    • Global solar generation in 2023 exceeded six times that of 2015, with India experiencing a seventeen-fold increase during the same period.
  • India needs to significantly ramp up annual capacity additions to meet ambitious target
    • India stands among the select few nations committed to tripling renewable capacity by 2030.

Opportunities for Solar energy in India

  • Increasing demand
    • The government’s ambitious target of 500 GW of installed capacity from non-fossil fuels by 2030 is the main driver to scale solar power in India.
    • India also accounts for the fastest rate of growth for demand of electricity through 2026 among major economies.
      • This is because of strong economic activity and expanding consumption of products to mitigate extreme weather.
    • According to NITI Aayog, as of May 2024, solar power while making up ~18% of India’s total installed electricity of 442 GW, made up only 66% of the power actually produced.
      • This data reflects the gap between potential and actuals as the power produced per year can vary due to fluctuations in a country’s power demand and local circumstances.
  • Estimated solar power potential
    • The country has an estimated solar power potential of 748.99 GW.
    • Hence, the potential of solar energy is not fully tapped, so far. The government is making efforts to harness the available potential through various schemes & programs.

WTO’s Agreement on Agriculture (AoA)

Why in News?

  • The US and Australia have contended that India has provided sugarcane subsidy beyond the limits set out in the WTO’s Agreement on Agriculture (AoA), which may have distorted global trade.

What’s in Today’s Article?

  • What is WTO’s Agreement on Agriculture (AoA)?
  • The AoA Consists of Three Pillars
  • Concerns Raised About India’s Sugarcane Subsidies

What is WTO’s Agreement on Agriculture (AoA)?

  • The AoA is an international treaty of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), negotiated during the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
    • It entered into force with the establishment of the WTO on 1 January 1995.
  • It includes the classification of subsidies by “boxes” depending on consequences of production and trade:
    • Amber (most directly linked to production levels),
    • Blue (production-limiting programmes that still distort trade), and
    • Green (minimal distortion).
  • While payments in the amber box had to be reduced, those in the green box were exempt from reduction commitments.
  • However, all must comply with the fundamental requirement:
    • To cause not more than minimal distortion of trade or production, and
    • Must be provided through a government-funded programme that does not involve transfers from consumers or price support to producers.

The AoA Consists of Three Pillars:

  • Domestic support:
    • AoA divides domestic support into two categories: trade-distorting and non-trade-distorting (or minimally trade-distorting).
    • The system currently allows Europe and the US to spend $380 billion a year on agricultural subsidies.
    • These subsidies end up flooding global markets with below-cost commodities, depressing prices, and undercutting producers in poor countries, a practice known as dumping.
  • Market access: Market access refers to the reduction of tariff (or non-tariff) barriers to trade by WTO members. The AoA consists of tariff reductions of:
    • 36% average reduction — developed countries — with a minimum of 15% per-tariff line reduction in next six years.
    • 24% average reduction — developing countries — with a minimum of 10% per-tariff line reduction in next ten years.
    • Least developed countries (LDCs) were exempt from tariff reductions. But they either had to convert non-tariff barriers to tariffs or “bind” their tariffs, creating a ceiling that could not be increased in future.
  • Export subsidies:
    • It requires developed countries to reduce export subsidies by at least 36% (by value) or by 21% (by volume) over six years.
    • For developing countries, the agreement required cuts were 24% (by value) and 14% (by volume) over ten years.

Concerns Raised About India’s Sugarcane Subsidies:

  • US-Australia report
    • It argued that during all the four years (2018-19 to 2021-22) India’s sugar subsidies crossed 90% of the value of production against the permissible level of 10%.
    • However, for calculating subsidy (Aggregate Measurement of Support [AMS]) levels, the report referred to the methodology recommended by a WTO panel that had ruled against Indian sugar subsidies in 2021.
      • AMS is a trade distorting (amber box) subsidy. Since it distorts trade, the AMS is categorized as a ‘reducible’, ‘non permissible’ or ‘non-exempted’ subsidy.
      • The AMS consists of two parts—product-specific subsidies and non-product specific subsidies.
      • Product-specific subsidy refers to the total level of support provided for each individual agricultural commodity. E.g., wheat AMS is the subsidy given specifically to wheat.
      • Non-product specific subsidy, refers to the total level of support given to the agricultural sector as a whole, i.e., subsidies on inputs such as fertilizers, electricity, irrigation, seeds, credit etc.
  • India’s stand
    • Each sugar season, India sets the Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) for sugarcane.
    • The FRP is an administered price that effectively acts as a floor price for sugar mills to pay farmers for sugarcane.
    • In addition, farmers are paid premiums for increased production efficiency, and farmers in some States are eligible for additional payments by sugar mills under specific State-level support, known as State-Advised Prices (SAPs).
    • In its appeal against the WTO panel report of 2021, India argued that the panel had erred in finding that the country’s FRP and SAP constituted market price support under the AoA.
  • 2021 Panel Report could not be adopted
    • The US-Australia report said India’s appeal prevented the panel report from being adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body.
    • As the Appellate Body of the WTO is not functional because of non-appointment of members, no decisions on appeals can be taken till it starts functioning again.

Socio – Ecological Effects of LPG Price Hikes

What’s in Today’s Article?

  • Background (Context, Govt’s Schemes, etc.)
  • LPG Price Rise (Mechanism, Impact, Alternatives, Way Ahead)

Background:

  • Council on Energy, Environment and Water, a Delhi-based think tank, had conducted a survey in 2014-15 called ACCESS Survey.
    • The Access to Clean Cooking Energy and Electricity – Survey of States (ACCESS) is India’s largest energy access survey.
  • As per the survey, LPG’s cost was the foremost barrier to its adoption and continued use in rural poor households.

Has the Government Been Successful in Pushing the Use of LPG Cylinders?

  • Since the start of the 21st century, successive governments have placed a premium on the cooking fuels in rural households transitioning to LPG.
  • 2009:
    • In 2009, the Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Vitrak Scheme was launched to increase LPG distribution in remote areas.
    • Nearly 45 million new LPG connections were thus established between 2010 and 2013.
  • 2015:
    • Direct Benefit Transfers (DBT) for LPG under the ‘PAHAL’ Scheme were initiated in 2015.
  • 2016:
    • In 2016, direct home-refill deliveries were implemented and the Give it Up program enrolled around 10 million LPG consumers to voluntarily discontinue subsidies and transfer their accounts to below-poverty-line households.
    • The Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) followed, to install LPG connections in 80 million below-poverty-line households by 2020.
    • The scheme also provides a subsidy of ₹200 for every 14.2-kg cylinder, which increased to ₹300 in October 2023.
  • However, it is important to note that India, with around ₹300/liter, has one of the highest LPG prices in the world.

How are Retail Prices for LPG Decided in India?

  • What the consumer pays for a 14.2 kg domestic LPG cylinder comprises three components – LPG price, dealer’s commission and taxes.
  • Unlike retail prices of petrol and diesel in India, where taxes account for the bulk of the price, for domestic cooking gas, almost 90 percent of the cylinder price is the cost of LPG.
    • Commission and taxes account for 11 percent of a cylinder’s retail price.
  • Also, more than 60 percent of India’s LPG needs are met through imports.

Consequences of Rising LPG Prices – Case Study

  • Study and its findings
    • In 2023, a study showed how local communities of the Jalpaiguri district in West Bengal depend on the forests for fuelwood.
    • Roughly half of the 214 local shops in 10 markets used fuelwood; the shop-workers reported the cost of a commercial cylinder, ₹1,900, to be too high.
    • Around 38.5% of Jalpaiguri’s population is below the poverty line and most of them work in tea estates with a daily wage of ₹250.
    • Against this backdrop, the persistent use of fuelwood as cooking fuel is unsurprising.
      • While the act of collecting fuelwood gives the people cooking fuel, it also degrades the forest and forces people to risk adverse encounters with wild animals.
  • Analysis
    • Due to various government schemes, most households in Jalpaiguri have LPG connections but few refill the cylinder even twice a year.
    • On introduction of the PMUY scheme, many households quickly switched to LPG from fuelwood, and reported that their cooking activities became fast and smokeless, they could forgo the need to rise early and the time and effort spent in collecting fuelwood.
    • However, the hike in the price of LPG has rendered these advantages short-lived.

What are the Suitable Alternatives?

  • Devising locally acceptable, suitable, and sustainable alternatives to fuelwood is important to secure the forests, wildlife and locals’ livelihoods.
  • Work is ongoing with the West Bengal Forest Department and Joint Forest Management Committees to help four villages acquire saplings of high fuelwood value.
    • This is being done on the conditions that they will be native species, prohibited from logging, unpalatable to elephants and will be maintained by locals.
  • Alternatives like efficient cooking stovesoptimized shade tree density in tea plantations, and multi-stakeholder meetings for resource governance are also in the works.

Way Ahead:

  • LPG price rise, especially over the last decade, could cause socio-ecological crises in places where there are no viable alternatives to fuelwood and socio-economic deprivation is common.
  • Future governments must focus on making, and keeping, LPG affordable.
  • At the same time, they also need to endeavor to free solid cooking fuels from socio-ecological endangerment.
  • For example, a national policy on smokeless cooking stoves that consume less fuelwood.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate Now