Introduction

• The Fundamental Rights are enshrined in Part III of the Constitution (Articles 12-35)
• Part III of the Constitution is described as the Magna Carta of India.
  1. ‘Magna Carta’, the Charter of Rights issued by King John of England in 1215 was the first written document relating to the Fundamental Rights of citizens.
• The Fundamental Rights: The Constitution of India provides for six Fundamental Rights:
  1. 1. Right to equality (Articles 14–18)
     2. Right to freedom (Articles 19–22)
     3. Right against exploitation (Articles 23–24)
     4. Right to freedom of religion (Articles 25–28)
     5. Cultural and educational rights (Articles 29–30)
     6. Right to constitutional remedies (Article 32)
• Originally the constitution also included Right to property (Article 31). However, it was deleted from the list of Fundamental Rights by the 44^th Amendment Act, 1978.
  1. 1. It is made a legal right under Article 300-A in Part XII of the Constitution.
• Provision for Laws Violating Fundamental Rights: Article 13 of the Indian constitution declares that all laws that are inconsistent with or in derogation of any of the fundamental rights shall be void.
  1. This power has been conferred on the Supreme Court (Article 32) and the high courts (Article 226).
  2. Further, the article declares that a constitutional amendment cannot be challenged (as it is not a law).
• However, the Supreme Court in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) held that a Constitutional amendment can be challenged if it violates a fundamental right.
• Writ Jurisdiction: A writ is a legal order given by a court of law.
  1. The Supreme Court (Article 32) and the High courts (Article 226) can issue the writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari and quo-warranto.

• Fundamental Rights in Indian constitution is inspired by the ‘Bill of Rights’ (Fundamental Rights) included in the constitution of the USA
• However, the right to property was deleted from the list of Fundamental Rights by the 44th Amendment Act, 1978. It is made a legal right under Article 300-A in Part XII of the Constitution. So at present, there are only six Fundamental Rights.

Features of The Fundamental Rights

Some of the salient features of Fundamental Rights include:

• Fundamental Rights are protected and guaranteed by the constitution.

• Fundamental Rights are NOT sacrosanct or absolute: in the sense that the parliament can curtail them or put reasonable restrictions for a fixed period of time. However, the court has the power to review the reasonability of the restrictions.

• Fundamental Rights are justiciable: The constitution allows the person to move directly to the Surpreme Court for the reinforcement of his fundamental right as and when they are violated or restricted.

• Suspension of Rights: The rights can be suspended during the operation of a National Emergency except the rights guaranteed by Articles 20 and 21.
  1. Further, the six rights guaranteed by Article 19 can be suspended only when there is an external emergency war or external aggression) [and not on the ground of armed rebellion (i.e., internal emergency].

• Restriction of Fundamental Rights: The Fundamental Rights can be restricted during military rule in any particular area.

• Not Sacrosanct, Permanent, or Absolute: They are not sacrosanct or permanent and the Parliament can curtail or repeal them but only by a constitutional amendment act.
  1. The rights are not absolute but qualified.
  2. The state can impose reasonable restrictions on them, however, the reasonability of the restrictions is decided by the courts.

• Restriction of Laws: Their application to the members of armed forces, paramilitary forces, police forces, intelligence agencies and analogous services can be restricted or abrogated by the Parliament (Article 33).
  1. Their application can be restricted while martial law (military rule imposed under abnormal circumstances) is in force in any area.

Definition of State

The term ‘State’ has been used in different provisions concerning the fundamental rights. Hence, Article 12 has defined the term for the purposes of Part III. According to it, the State includes the following:

(a) Government and Parliament of India, that is, executive and legislative organs of the Union government.
(b) Government and legislature of states, that is, executive and legislative organs of state government.
(c) All local authorities, that is, municipalities, panchayats, district boards, improvement trusts, etc.
(d) All other authorities, that is, statutory or non-statutory authorities like LIC, ONGC, SAIL, etc. Thus, State has been defined in a wider sense so as to include all its agencies. It is the actions of these agencies that can be challenged in the courts as violating the Fundamental Rights.

According to the Supreme Court, even a private body or an agency working as an instrument of the State falls within the meaning of the ‘State’ under Article 12.

Laws inconsistent with Fundamental Rights

• Article 13 declares that all laws that are inconsistent with or in derogation of any of the fundamental rights shall be void. In other words, it expressively provides for the doctrine of judicial review. This power has been conferred on the Supreme Court (Article 32) and the high courts (Article 226) that can declare a law unconstitutional and invalid on the ground of contravention of any of the Fundamental
  Rights.

The term ‘law’ in Article 13 has been given a wide connotation so as to include the following:

(a) Permanent laws enacted by the Parliament or the state legislatures;
(b) Temporary laws like ordinances issued by the president or the state governors;
(c) Statutory instruments in the nature of delegated legislation (executive legislation) like order, bye-law, rule, regulation or notification; and
(d) Non-legislative sources of law, that is, custom or usage having the force of law.

Thus, not only a legislation but any of the above can be challenged in the courts as violating a Fundamental Right and hence, can be declared as void. Further, Article 13 declares that a constitutional amendment is not a law and hence cannot be challenged. However, the Supreme Court
held in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) that a Constitutional amendment can be challenged on the ground that it violates a fundamental right that forms a part of the ‘basic structure’ of the Constitution and hence, can be declared as void.

Fundamental Rights :

Right to Equality (Article 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18):

• Right to Equality (Articles 14 – 18): The right to equality includes the following: equality before the law; prohibition of discrimination on the basis of religion; race; caste; sex; or place of birth; and the provision of equal opportunity in employment-related matters.
• Equality Before Law: Article 14 says that no person shall be denied treatment of equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.
  • The right is extended to all persons whether citizens or foreigners, statutory corporations, companies, registered societies or any other type of legal person.
  • Exceptions: As per article 361, the President of India or Governor of states is not answerable to any court for the exercise of their powers/duties and no civil or criminal proceedings can occur or continue against them in any court during their term of office.
    • As per article 361-A, no civil or court proceedings can occur for a person for publishing any substantially true report of either House of the Parliament and State Legislature.
    • No member of Parliament (article 105) and State Legislature (article 194) shall be liable to any court proceedings in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in Parliament or any committee.
    • The foreign sovereigns (rulers), ambassadors and diplomats enjoy immunity from criminal and civil proceedings.
• Prohibition of Discrimination: Article 15 provides that no citizen shall be discriminated on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.
  • Exception: Certain provisions can be made for the women, children, citizens from any socially or educationally backward class for their upliftment (such as reservation and access to free education).
• Equality of Opportunity in Public Employment: Article 16 of the Indian constitution provides for equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters of employment or appointment to any public office.
  • Exceptions: There are provisions for reservation in appointments or posts for any backward class that is not adequately represented in the state services.
    • Also, an incumbent of a religious or denominational institution may belong to the particular religion or denomination.
• Abolition of Untouchability: Article 17 abolishes ‘untouchability’ and forbids its practice in any form. The enforcement of any disability arising out of untouchability shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.
  • A person convicted of the offence of ‘untouchability’ is disqualified for election to the Parliament or state legislature. The acts of offences include:
    • Preaching untouchability directly or indirectly.
    • Preventing any person from entering any shop, hotel, public place of worship and place of public entertainment.
    • Refusing to admit persons in hospitals, educational institutions or hostels established for public benefit.
    • Justifying untouchability on traditional, religious, philosophical or other grounds.
    • Insulting a person belonging to scheduled caste on the ground of untouchability.
• Abolition of Titles: Article 18 of the constitution of India abolishes titles and makes four provisions in that regard:
  • It prohibits the state from conferring any title on any citizen or a foreigner (except a military or academic distinction).
  • It prohibits a citizen of India from accepting any title from any foreign state.
  • A foreigner holding any office of profit or trust under the state cannot accept any title from any foreign state without the consent of the President of India.
  • No citizen or foreigner holding any office of profit or trust within the territory of India can accept any present, emolument or office from or under any foreign State without the consent of the president.

Right to Freedom (Article 19, 20, 21 and 22):

• Right to Freedom (Articles 19 – 22): Rights to free speech, assembly, association, or union-building, movement, residence, and the ability to participate in any profession or occupation (some of these rights are subject to security of the State, friendly relations with foreign countries, public order, decency or morality).
• Protection of 6 Rights: Article 19 guarantees to all citizens the six rights of freedom including:
  • Right to freedom of speech and expression.
    • Expressing one’s own views, opinions, belief and convictions freely by word of mouth, writing, printing, picturing or in any other manner.
  • Right to assemble peaceably and without arms.
    • Includes the right to hold public meetings, demonstrations and take out processions which can be exercised only on public land.
    • It does not protect violent, disorderly and riotous assemblies or strike.
  • Right to form associations or unions or co-operative societies.
    • It includes the right to form (and not to form) political parties, companies, partnership firms, societies, clubs, organisations, trade unions or any body of persons.
  • Right to move freely throughout the territory of India.
    • The freedom of movement has two dimensions, viz, internal (right to move inside the country) (article 19) and external (right to move out of the country and right to come back to the country) (article 21).
  • Right to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India.
    • The right of outsiders to reside and settle in tribal areas is restricted to protect the distinctive culture and customs of scheduled tribes and to safeguard their traditional vocation and properties against exploitation.
  • Right to practice any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.
    • It doesn’t include the right to carry on a profession that is immoral (trafficking in women or children) or dangerous (harmful drugs or explosives, etc,).
• Protection in Respect of Conviction for Offences: Article 20 grants protection against arbitrary and excessive punishment to an accused person, whether citizen or foreigner or legal person like a company or a corporation. It provides that:
  • No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act or subjected to a penalty greater than that prescribed by the law.
  • No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.
  • No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.
• Protection of Life and Personal Liberty: Article 21 declares that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. This right is available to both citizens and non-citizens.
  • The right to life is not merely confined to animal existence or survival but also includes the right to live with human dignity and all those aspects of life which go to make a man’s life meaningful, complete and worth living.
• Right to Education: Article 21 (A) declares that the State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years.
  • This provision makes only elementary education a Fundamental Right and not higher or professional education.
  • This provision was added by the 86^th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2002.
  • Before the 86^th amendment, the Constitution contained a provision for free and compulsory education for children under Article 45 in Part IV of the constitution.
• Protection Against Arrest and Detention: Article 22 grants protection to persons who are arrested or detained.
  • Detention is of two types, namely, punitive (punishment after trial and conviction) and preventive (punishment without trial and conviction).
  • The first part of Article 22 deals with the ordinary law and includes:
    • Right to be informed of the grounds of arrest.
    • Right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner.
    • Right to be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, excluding the journey time.
    • Right to be released after 24 hours unless the magistrate authorises further detention.
  • The second part of Article 22 deals with preventive detention law. Protection under this article is available to both citizens as well as aliens and includes the following:
    • The detention of a person cannot exceed three months unless an advisory board (judges of high court) reports sufficient cause for extended detention.
    • The grounds of detention should be communicated to the detenu.
    • The detenu should be afforded an opportunity to make a representation against the detention order.

Right Against Exploitation (Article 23 and 24)

• Prohibition of Human Trafficking and Forced Labour: Forced labour in India was imposed by landlords, moneylenders and other wealthy persons in the past.
  • The Article 23 of the Indian Constitution prohibits human trafficking and begar (forced labour without payment) to protect the millions of underprivileged and deprived people of the country.
  • The right is available to citizens of India as well as to non-citizens.
  • The right provides against human trafficking in the form of:
    • Selling and buying of men, women and children.
    • Prostitution
    • Devadasis
    • Slavery.
  • The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act 13, 1956 has been enacted to deal with violations of this fundamental right.
• Prohibition of Child Labour: Article 24 of the Indian Constitution forbids employment of children below the age of 14 years in dangerous jobs like factories and mines.
  • However, it did not prohibit their employment in any harmless or innocent work.
  • The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 (renamed as Child & Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 in 2016) specifically deals with the violations of related to this right.
    • The 2016 amendment of this act completely prohibited employment or of children below 14 years of age in all occupations and processes.
    • It also prohibited the employment of adolescents (14-18 years of age) in hazardous occupations or processes

Right to Freedom of Religion (Article 25-28)

• Freedom of Conscience, Profession, Practice and Propagation: Article 25 of the Constitution of India provides the freedom of conscience, to profess, to practice and to propagate any religion. These rights are available to citizens as well as non-citizens.
  • Conscience: A person may or may not choose to follow any religion.
  • Right to Profess: One can declare his/her religious beliefs and faith openly and freely.
  • Right to Practice: Performance of religious worship, rituals, ceremonies and exhibition of beliefs and ideas.
  • Right to Propagate: Persuading people to convert from one religion to another. However, the Constitution does not allow forcible conversions.
    • It only gives us the right to spread information about our religion and thus attract others to it.
  • Limitations: The government can impose restrictions on the practice of freedom of religion in order to protect public order, morality and health.
    • The government can interfere in religious matters for rooting out certain social evils. For example: banning practices like sati, bigamy or human sacrifice.
      • Such restrictions cannot be opposed in the name of interference in the right to freedom of religion.
• Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs: The Article 26 of the Indian Constitution provides every religious denomination (or any section of it) the right to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes.
  • It also empowers the religious denominations to manage their own affairs in matters of religion.
  • Moreover, the right to own and acquire movable and immovable property and the right to administer such property is also provided to every religious denomination.
  • The rights provided under Article 26 are also subjected to public order, morality and health.
• Freedom from Taxation for Promotion of a Religion: The Indian Constitution under Article 27 lays down that no person shall be compelled to pay any taxes for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination.
  • It says that no public money, collected through taxes, shall be spent for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.
    • Favouring, patronising or supporting any religion over the other is prohibited.
  • It prohibits only levy of a tax and not a fee.
    • The purpose of a fee is to control secular administration of religious institutions and not to promote or maintain religion.
• Freedom from Attending Religious Instruction: Article 28 states that no religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of State (the territory of India) funds.
  • However, the provision is not applicable to educational institutions administered by the State or established under any endowment or trust.
  • Moreover, no person is required to attend any religious instructions or worship without his consent in any educational institution recognised by the State or receiving aid out of State funds.
    • In case of a minor, the consent of his guardian is needed.

Cultural and Educational Rights (Article 29 and 30)

• Protection of Interests of Minorities: Article 29 provides that every section of citizens residing in any part of the country have the right to protect and conserve its own distinct language, script or culture (it provides the right to a group/section/community of people).
  • Further, it says that no citizen shall be denied admission into any educational institution on grounds only of religion, race, caste, or language (it provides the rights to an individual citizen).
  • Article 29 grants protection to both religious, linguistic as well as cultural minorities.
    • However, the rights are not necessarily restricted to minorities only, as it is commonly assumed to be. It includes minorities as well as the majority.
• Right of Minorities to Establish and Administer Educational Institutions: Article 30 grants all the minorities the following rights:
  • The right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
  • The compensation amount fixed by the State for the compulsory acquisition of any property of a minority educational institution shall not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed to them.
    • This provision was added by the 44^th Amendment Act, 1978 to protect the right of minorities in this regard.
  • The State shall not discriminate against any educational institution managed by a minority.
  • Thus, the protection under Article 30 is confined only to minorities (religious, cultural or linguistic) and does not extend to any other section of citizens (as under Article 29).

Article 31, 31A, 31B and 31C

• Originally, the right to property was one of the seven fundamental rights and provided that no person shall be deprived of his property except by authority of law.
  • However, being one the most controversial rights, the 44^th Amendment Act of 1978 abolished the right to property as a Fundamental Right and made it a legal right (constitutional right) under Article 300A in Part XII of the Constitution.
• Article 31 led to a number of Constitutional amendments; 1^st, 4^th, 7^th, 25^th, 39^th, 40^th and 42^nd Amendments.
  • The First Amendment Act, 1951 inserted Articles 31A and 31B to the Constitution.
    • Article 31C was inserted in the Constitution by 25^th Amendment Act, 1971.
• Article 31A: It saves five categories of laws from being challenged and invalidated on the ground of contravention of the fundamental rights conferred by Article 14 and Article 19.
  • It includes:
    • Acquisition of estates and related rights by the State;
    • Taking over the management of properties by the State;
    • Amalgamation of corporations;
    • Extinguishment or modification of rights of directors or shareholders of corporations
    • Extinguishment or modification of mining leases.
  • It also provides the guaranteed right to compensation in case of acquisition or requisition of the private property by the state.
• Article 31B: It protects the acts and regulations included in the Ninth Schedule from being challenged and invalidated on the ground of contravention of any of the fundamental rights.
  • The scope of Article 31B is wider than Article 31A as it immunises any law included in the Ninth Schedule from the Fundamental Rights (unlike article 31A that protects only five categories).
  • However, the Supreme Court in its judgement in the I.R. Coelho case (2007) ruled that even laws under the Ninth Schedule would be open to scrutiny if they violated Fundamental Rights or the basic structure of the Constitution.
    • The Supreme Court first propounded the doctrine of ‘basic structure’ of the constitution in the Kesavananda Bharati on April 24, 1973.
• Article 31C: It contained two provisions:
  • It says that no law that seeks to implement socialistic directive principles specified in Articles 39 (b) and (c), shall be declared void on the grounds of contravention of the fundamental rights conferred by Article 14 or Article 19.
  • Moreover, no law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be questioned in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to such a policy.

Note : Articles 31A, 31B and 31C have been retained as exceptions to the fundamental rights.

Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32)

• Article 32 is considered the most important article of the Constitution as it provides that the right to get Fundamental Rights protected is itself a fundamental right.
  • It confers the right to remedies for the enforcement of the fundamental rights of an aggrieved citizen.
• The Supreme Court has ruled that Article 32 is a basic feature of the Constitution. Hence, it cannot be abridged or taken away even by way of an amendment to the Constitution.
• It contains the following four provisions:
  • The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the Fundamental Rights.
  • The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs for the enforcement of any of the fundamental rights.
  • Parliament can empower any other court to issue directions, orders and writs of all kinds.
    • Any other court here does not include high courts because (Article 226) has already conferred these powers on the high courts.
  • The right to move the Supreme Court shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by the Constitution.
    • In the case of national emergency, the right can be suspended by the President (Article 359).
• Only the Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution can be enforced under Article 32 and not any other right like non-fundamental constitutional rights, statutory rights, customary rights etc.
  • The violation of a fundamental right is the sine qua non (absolutely necessary condition) for the exercise of the right conferred by Article 32.

Article 33, 34 and 35

• Article 33: It empowers the Parliament to restrict or abrogate the fundamental rights of the ‘Members of the Armed Forces’, paramilitary forces, police forces, intelligence agencies and analogous forces.
  • The objective of this provision is to ensure the proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them.
  • The power to make laws under Article 33 is conferred only on Parliament and not on state legislatures.
    • Any such law made by Parliament cannot be challenged in any court on the ground of contravention of any of the fundamental rights.
  • The ‘members of the armed forces’ also covers non-combatant employees of the armed forces such as barbers, carpenters, mechanics, cooks, chowkidars, bootmakers and tailors.
• Article 34: It provides for the restrictions on fundamental rights while martial law is in force in any area within the territory of India. The expression ‘martial law’ has not been defined anywhere in the Constitution but literally, it means ‘military rule’.
  • The martial law is imposed under extraordinary circumstances like war, invasion, insurrection, rebellion, riot or any violent resistance to law.
  • Article 34 empowers the Parliament to indemnify (compensate) any government servant or any other person for any act done by him in connection with the maintenance or restoration of order in any area where martial law was in force.
    • The Act of Indemnity made by the Parliament cannot be challenged in any court on the ground of contravention of any of the fundamental rights.
• Article 35: Article 35 lays down that the power to make laws, to give effect to certain specified fundamental rights shall vest only in the Parliament and not in the state legislatures.
  • Powers of Parliament (only) to Make Laws:
    • Prescribing residence as a condition for certain employment or appointments in a state/UT/local or any other authority.
    • Empowering courts other than the Supreme Court and the high courts to issue directions, orders and writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights.
    • Restricting or abrogating the application of Fundamental Rights to members of armed forces, police forces, etc.
    • Indemnifying any government servant or any other person for any act done during the operation of martial law in any area.
    • The Parliament has powers to make laws prescribing punishment for offences such as untouchability and traffic in human beings and forced labour.
  • Article 35 extends the competence of the Parliament to make a law on the specified matters even those matters which may fall within the sphere of the state legislatures (i.e., State List).

Significance of Fundamental Rights

In spite of the above criticism and shortcomings, the Fundamental Rights are significant in the following respects:

1. They constitute the bedrock of democratic system in the country.
2. They provide necessary conditions for the material and moralprotection of man.
3. They serve as a formidable bulwark of individual liberty.
4. They facilitate the establishment of rule of law in the country.
5. They protect the interests of minorities and weaker sections of society.
6. They strengthen the secular fabric of the Indian State.
7. They check the absoluteness of the authority of the government.
8. They lay down the foundation stone of social equality and social justice.
9. They ensure the dignity and respect of individuals.
10. They facilitate the participation of people in the political and administrative process.

Amendability of Fundamental Rights

Any changes to the fundamental rights require a constitutional amendment that should be passed by both the Houses of Parliament. The amendment bill should be passed by a special majority of Parliament.

As per the Constitution, Article 13(2) states that no laws can be made that take away fundamental rights.

• In the Sajjan Singh case of 1965, the Supreme Court held that the Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution including fundamental rights.
• But in 1967, the SC reversed its stance taken earlier when in the verdict of the Golaknath case, it said that the fundamental rights cannot be amended.
• In 1973, a landmark judgement ensued in the Kesavananda Bharati case, where the SC held that although no part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, was beyond the Parliament’s amending power, the “basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment.”
• This is the basis in Indian law in which the judiciary can strike down any amendment passed by Parliament that is in conflict with the basic structure of the Constitution.
• In 1981, the Supreme Court reiterated the Basic Structure doctrine. 
• It also drew a line of demarcation as April 24th, 1973 i.e., the date of the Kesavananda Bharati judgement, and held that it should not be applied retrospectively to reopen the validity of any amendment to the Constitution which took place prior to that date.

Doctrine of Severability

• This is a doctrine that protects the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution.
• It is also known as the Doctrine of Separability.
• It is mentioned in Article 13, according to which all laws that were enforced in India before the commencement of the Constitution, inconsistent with the provisions of fundamental rights shall to the extent of that inconsistency be void.
• This implies that only the parts of the statute that is inconsistent shall be deemed void and not the whole statue. Only those provisions which are inconsistent with fundamental rights shall be void.

Doctrine of Eclipse

• This doctrine states that any law that violates fundamental rights is not null or void ab initio, but is only non-enforceable, i.e., it is not dead but inactive. 
• This implies that whenever that fundamental right (which was violated by the law) is struck down, the law becomes active again (is revived). 
• Another point to note is that the doctrine of eclipse applies only to pre-constitutional laws (laws that were enacted before the Constitution came into force) and not to post-constitutional laws. 
• This means that any post-constitutional law which is violative of a fundamental right is void ab initio.

Conclusion

The Fundamental Rights, despite having a lot of exceptions & restrictions and lack of permanency, are a crucial part of the Constitution of India as:

• • They provide necessary conditions for the material and moral protection of man and ensure the liberty of every individual.
  • These rights protect the interests of minorities and weaker sections of society and also strengthen the notion of India as a secular State.
  • They ensure the dignity and respect of individuals by laying down the foundation of social equality and justice.